The results showed that the freshmen students' brains underwent significant changes and were very different from that of the older adults. The majority of voters in opinion polls, including half of those in the 16-18 year old group, felt that the voting age should stay at 18. And most kids, except celebrities, can not get a decent job leaving school at 16-17, support themselves or raise a child on their own. Its obvious- teens today are oblivious and ignorant. Because of their lack of experience they are likely to be manipulated by others, according to HeadCount. Above all, it would help guarantee the supply of young voters needed to preserve the vitality of democracy. If a teenager doesn´t care about an election, that doesn´t mean that they shouldn´t be allowed to vote.
Heck, it should be lowered to 14-year-old people can. Therefore, they are more understanding and are more likely to chose what they think is right, not just choosing the party that they voted for in the last election. Politicians increasingly woo older voters—not only because they are more likely to vote but also because they make up a growing share of the electorate. Visiting the polls shouldn't just be out of habit. What about us teens that are smart and responsible? This is problematic because many college students go to school several hours away from home and they still have classes on election day. Their bodies are fully adult, they have been educated for at least 10 years, and most of them have some experience of work as well as school.
The most common examples of these are the responsibilities of joining the armed forces, raising a family and paying tax, the argument being that if you can die for your country, get married and pay tax, you should have the right to indicate your feelings to the government. You might notice today that more young people favor democrats because they want others to pay for their College, their healthcare, their housing, etc. Either family helps or they become dependent on government services. At 16 and 17, teens are just getting access to the car, but they are still not trusted to do things like gamble, consume tobacco, and drink alcohol. The voting age should not be lowered to 16. House of Representatives is 57.
If they are now in a responsible stage of their life, they deserve a say on who will decide how their schools will be run through elections! Rich children with investment funds and child stars all earn money at a young age and are taxed on it. This was famously the grievance of the thirteen colonies that sparked the American revolution. . There is no magic difference between 16 and 18 - indeed, many 16 year olds are more sensible than some 20 year olds. The voting age was reduced from 21 to 18 in 1969.
Whilst they may realise that whatever happens has an effect on them and their lives, and may loosely follow the goings on of the world, they are not doing so to the point where they have warranted a vote. Social media creates a fun, interactive environment for these teenagers too. It is also wrong to suggest that voters vote according to their age; the elderly are likely to have grandchildren whose interests they may well respect when voting. Here is why: teenagers, as we know, are more adoptable to change than adults. There are many adults that have a college education that have no clue who is on the money they spend everyday.
Today, there is a growing movement to allow teenagers aged 16 and 17 to vote in elections. Some 16 year olds have the mental and emotional development of a pre-teen, whilst others have a wise head on young shoulders. It would be dangerous to give young people the vote. Politicians would be more likely to act on these if young people could vote. The vote for 16-18 year olds would help redress the growing age imbalance which is occurring as a result of aging. Lowering the voting is a smart thing to do because, not only does it give them a chance to get involved, it helps them Grow up. Electing people to government is something of the highest of value and whomever is elected can affect peoples lives.
If young people are treated as in constant need of state hand-holding and protection, extending the franchise hardly suggests a broader confidence in 16 year olds as capable of the adult responsibility of deciding who runs the country. Earlier this week, Calgary City Coun. The brain is not fully developed until the age of 25. Governments need to find ways to rekindle the passion, rather than continue to ignore its absence. Of course you have ups and downs to everything in life, same for but you can't generalize all of them. If they got the right to have a say in what country they want to live in, they would do their research and take an interest in politics and vote for what they think is best for the country. How does lowering the age help this? No responsible parent would give them that authority in their own home.
I think, therefore, that we are stuck with the age criterion for the long haul. Policies such as the minimum wage and working hours and conditions are also set by governments, and if young people are old enough to have jobs they should be able to have their say in these issues. Unfortunately, when it comes to electing lawmakers whose decisions about gun control and other issues affect their lives, these teens lack any real power. Let them be kids for the few years they have. This is because people are more likely to maintain the habit of voting throughout their lives if they start at a younger age. Meanwhile, in Berkeley, California, people 16 and up can now vote in local school board elections. Do you really just want people to control us teens? It makes sense for the right to vote to be at a younger age precisely because the individual has fewer changes to deal with at a younger age, they will therefore find it easier to learn to vote.
It is therefore one of the most important ways in which other rights e. Many young people see elections stacked against them. Today, less than half of 18 to 29-year-olds vote in presidential elections. Supporters of the idea have pointed to this rise in student activism as challenging the tiresome stereotype that American teens are narcissists whose brains have been idled by smartphones. With this new research in mind, many states have raised the age at which teens are allowed to do certain things, not lowered it. It is no surprise, then, that many of them turn away from voting.