Perhaps Costly Drug testing may be expensive. Drug or alcohol use can cause accidents in the workplace, which costs the company a lot of time and money. The last example emphasizing this reason is the increase in the number of sober employees in the contemporary workplace. Even a simple test such as an urinalysis can prove to be an extremely effective deterrent, used not just for detection. The adoption of random drug tests has been crucial in leading to this significant decline in the death rates at the work place.
Workplace drug testing in America is being forced on employers for economic and safety reasons. Importantly, all of these could be true even in the absence of a deterrent effect of testing. Respondents are also asked about the penalty for first drug test offense in their workplace. Office of Applied Studies Analytic Series Paper A-11. In this paper, I will explore the controversy from several different perspectives, analyzing the most important arguments both for and against permitting businesses to engage in employee drug testing. This case highlights irregular sackings.
Drug abuse in the workplace constitutes a serious hazard to others. These job characteristics may be important, as some courts and governments have regulated the types of jobs in which testing can take place e. Critics of drug-testing programs argue that employees have a basic right to privacy. For example, an employee of a construction rental company is assigned to a 6:30 am delivery. That presumption of innocence is very important to any nation's legal structure. For example, many organizations have continued engaging in pre-employment drug tests. In September 15, 1986, President Ronald Reagan signed execute order 12564, his goal was to establish a drug-free workplace.
These models include all the control variables listed in column 4 of. The problems, moreover, do not exclude any workplace. An Adelaide, Australia testing lab which regularly conducts urine drug tests for doctors is calling for the compulsory drug testing of all doctors and pilots. People have come out to support drug testing in business organizations emphasizing that it gives the organization the reputation it needs and boosts the level of safety in the workplace. States with unclear employee protections The following four states have marijuana laws that are either silent or vague regarding employee protections, and their state regulatory agencies have not provided guidance on employee protections.
These bills also regulated the drug testing procedure so as to diminish the likelihood of employees losing their jobs from false positive results. We use information from these responses to create an outcome variable called Marijuana Use that equals one if the respondent used marijuana at least 1 day of the previous 30 and zero otherwise. Under the circumstances, drug testing can be a form of insurance policy. The only difference is, in most cases, your employer must have that you have been taking drugs before you can be tested. Which drugs are commonly abused by employees? But an even more thorough process is blood and saliva tests. Summing up the paper, I will decide who has the best argument for their beliefs and explain a possible rationale for those beliefs.
. Again, organizations have to engage in different actions that illustrate their desire to stick to the desired moral and ethical standards. Proponents of routine or random drug-testing claim that employers have a moral right to a fair day's work in exchange for a fair day's pay. Drug testing in the workplace and in public schools. We further restrict attention to marijuana because previous evidence suggests that it is the main concern of employers and the drug with the highest test positive rates. Employers may wonder if it is even worth it to drug test if the results could be inaccurate or misleading. Our courts have consistently held that random drug testing of public employees violates the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unreasonable searches.
Second, the existing studies provide little or no information on other drug programs or policies in the respondents' workplaces. However, large negative associations are also found for variables indicating whether a firm has drug education, an employee assistance program, or a simple written policy about substance use. They also help control the constant spread of the drug abuse habit to other members of the organization. The aim of testing is to prevent mistakes, not to allocate blame after the event. Cited: European Monitoring Center for Drugs and Drug Addiction.
The argument then is that what the employee does on his or her personal time is none of the business of her employer. However, as an applicant you may not be hired as a result of not taking the drug test. Pre-employment and random drug testing is administered to protect employees, as well as the general public to ensure consumers are confident that employees are working coherently. However, the issue of employee drug testing in business organizations remains controversial as people hold different opinions on its significance. Since the drugs were taken last night, a staff may no longer be under the influence while at work. About the Author This article was created by a professional writer and edited by experienced copy editors, both qualified members of the Demand Media Studios community.